These are my 10 questions about 9/11:
3) Who won? – Meaning: Who got what he / they wanted?
If Usama Bin Laden (as the FBI named him) was the winner, because he hit first, he could be blamed by everyone of provoking over a decade of pain to the muslin world… and I doubt that he was so stupid (being so smart, as the CIA described him) of not knowing that attacking Americans in their own land will bring war to the Middle East and some Occidental Countries in Asia. I doubt he wanted to attack the US in US continental land.
In the other hand, if it was an internal job, those willing to attack the Middle East and bigger oil producers would have found the perfect excuse to initiate a war that in the first stages would have surrounded Iran with US forces. General Carl explain very well this last point [Video].
President Mr. Obama, former president Mr. Bush, The New York Times , The Washington post , and so on, had always blamed on Usama Bin Laden the authorship of the horrendous attacks of September 11th.
The truth is that after nine and a half years the FBI haven’t blamed directly on him about those attacks, only founding him responsible for: “Murder of U.S. Nationals Outside the United States; Conspiracy to Murder U.S. Nationals Outside the United States; Attack on a Federal Facility Resulting in Death”   … but no a single word about the attacks of 9/11.
It is very frustrating to me to see how millions and millions of people cheered about the decease of the most infamous and wanted terrorist, without a single verifiable proof of his death.
We had been told that his body had been buried in the ocean, because religious reasons. But without body, without instant pictures, without videotape, without any witness not related to government agencies or departments able to verify the identity of the body…, what do we have? Just words.
The public enemy number one was lost for almost ten years, not in Iraq or Afghanistan, but in an allied sovereign land; and now is lost forever in deep sea waters….